« Austen stationery | Main | Part 1 review »

July 27, 2007

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341cdbd553ef00e3982682d78833

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference 50: The truth about Jane Austen and Tom Lefroy:

Comments

Ms. Place

Like so many romances of one's youth, this one probably faded from Jane's mind as a sweet but distant memory. Wonderful post.

Linda

Interesting post... thank you! I just saw Becoming Jane last night and thought is was only OK. It was like a Jane Austen movie, yet without Jane's spark of language (which made me realize how important words are to her stories, as well as the best adaptations). It's intriguing that you post that she may have been joking or sarcastic when speaking of Tom. Could you imagine someone going through your letters in 200 years, and attaching a great romance to a trifling flirtation that you may not remember within 20 years. Interesting theory!

Lori

Yes -- or going through emails. Argh! I think only Cassandra knew what Jane was really thinking, but I'm sure she had a crush, and agree with Ms. Place -- it probably became a good but distant memory.

too much like austen

I don't know much about her but what i do know is that she loved love. Therefore she had to have experienced it because no matter how much you believe in love you never are sure about it until you experience it. I am not forgetting though that it is the belief of love that leads to love in the first place. But going on, it is also evident that the love relationship did not last hence why the love lasted until Jane Austin's death. So if this fling is with Tom, despite her sarcasm she did love him. And it probably was as intense of a love if not more intense as the movie Becoming Jane suggests. I believe that she felt unworthy because of her circumstances and she let him go. She wrote to do two things : to live in that love again and again as often as she liked, and to make enough money to feel worthy enough for Tom. But what she probably didn't learn until she was writing Persusian is that she didn't have faith in her love with Tom and that alone is why their relationship did not last. She had only faith in her writing, which was timeless (that's what they say and i do agree)

Bekah

When reading Jane's novels, and comparing them to her life, you see so many similarities. That's not going to change when comparing to Jane's love life. I think she really did love Tom. Someone as sensible as Jane Austen-how could she not?

shEyla

i cant wait to read all of em' novels.
i think my horizons over literature need to be widened first as Mr. lefroy suggested!
she did have a clever mind which she used to express in a high level of understanding

jan p

The thing that many people do not know is that there are some interesting details to this story supposedly..such as they're meeting at at the holidays. Tom later had a daughter and he named her, Jane, but before you jump, that was also the name of his MIL and a common name at the time..but he did give the girl Christmas as a middle name, which is coincidentally the first time they met...

Tom also came back to the town of Jane and his aunt, not long before his marriage and visited. There is no found mention of their meeting but.

Parts of Jane's letters, have been removed by her sister Cassie, after Jane's death, they do know.

And then there is finally, the discussion of Jane Austen's funeral.

Tom Lefroy traveled all the way from Ireland to England to attend it. At that time, not an easy task.

He, also attended an auction of her effects. He ironically purchased the first rejection letter to the manuscript that would be called Pride and Prejudice.

Some say Darcy might have been partly modeled after him.

These items I think are curious and not commonly known...

To think someone you might once had connection with does these particular things after your death? Remember in those days, your reputation spoke volumes. So I'm sure her family was protective of her.

Unique, tragic and heartwarming .

The comments to this entry are closed.